Cases 1 - 10 of 1,135,927
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis v. West et al
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Louis Davis
Defendant:
Warden Mr. West and Brinden Murry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Ward et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
William R. Jackson
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Kim Patton-Johnson and Stephanie Damiels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jamonte Brinkley
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Andrew Mcfarlane, Veronica Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jemison et al v. Heredia et al
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Willie Jemison and Curtis Hardy
Defendant:
Martin Gonzalez Heredia and Carry-On Freight Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Whitfield v. Selene Finance, LP
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Lequita R Whitfield
Defendant:
Selene Finance, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DAVIS v. MONROE et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
SHELAINE V DAVIS
Defendant:
JUDGE MATT MONROE, JUSTO CABRAL, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CHAPMAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
YAQUAN LAVETT SANDY CHAPMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AMERSON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN CURTIS L JEFFERIES, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
