Cases 41 - 50 of 241,699
AMERSON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN CURTIS L JEFFERIES, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. American Senior Communities, LLC
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
American Senior Communities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Taebel v. NFL
as 3:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
NFL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Larry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Torrence Larry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pisarski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Pisarski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sigmon v. SSA
as 0:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Shade A. Sigmon
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Saacks v. Burlington Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv01273
Plaintiff:
Jay Saacks
Defendant:
Burlington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Thibodeaux v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Cody Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Randy Lavespere and Jonathan Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veres v. Fastwyre Broadband
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Cathie Veres
Defendant:
Fastwyre Broadband doing business as Moundville Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
