Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,852
TIMBERLAKE v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN TIMBERLAKE
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID J. CLOSE, JAMES JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LOWE, SGT KEMP, C.O. CROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. GUTHRIE
as 2:2024cv02170
Plaintiff:
DION M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CPL GUTHRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALEY v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv02082
Plaintiff:
ALEX HAYDN HALEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL., INC., KAREN MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN and ROSS P. BUSCEMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. TICE et al
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MILLER
Defendant:
ERIC TICE, KEVIN TURNER, T. Knepper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BRUNNER v. GILSON et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BRUNNER
Defendant:
ALYSSA GILSON and KRISTIN MCHENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS et al v. HARRY
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
AARON V. SIMS and DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. BROTHERS et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
SHAWN HAMILTON
Defendant:
MARK BROTHERS, AMY VARNER and DONALD BECHOTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY and SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
