Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23,277
DAVIS v. MONROE et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
SHELAINE V DAVIS
Defendant:
JUDGE MATT MONROE, JUSTO CABRAL, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gray v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
David B. Gray
Defendant:
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Smith et al v. Bains et al
as 1:2024cv02102
Plaintiff:
Henrietta Smith and Nickeil Bethea-Smith
Defendant:
Stacey Bains, Kara Padgett, Amanda Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Atlanta Missions
as 1:2024cv02108
Plaintiff:
Nadira Pittman
Defendant:
Atlanta Missions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Streiff v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02118
Plaintiff:
Jordan Daniel Streiff
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seal v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02117
Plaintiff:
Ryan Seal
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erickson v. Barmettler et al
as 1:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Matthew Erickson
Defendant:
Officer Jesse Barmettler and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrison v. State of GA Department of Labor
as 1:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Carneeda Ann Garrison
Defendant:
State of GA Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
