District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 41 - 50 of 90,232
Henderson v. Pettway
as 2:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Betty Henderson
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Pettway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thorn v. Buffalo Rock Company et al
as 3:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Michael E Thorn
Defendant:
Buffalo Rock Company and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herring v. Collection Associates Ltd et al
as 5:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Susan Herring
Defendant:
Collection Associates Ltd and AvanteUSA Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. Ivey et al
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Will Ainsworth, House Speaker Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Read Freely Alabama et al v. Autauga-Prattville Public Library Board of Trustees
as 2:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Read Freely Alabama, Alabama Library Assocation, Samantha Diamond and others
Defendant:
Autauga-Prattville Public Library Board of Trustees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mcelroy v. The Bibb County Health Care Authority
as 7:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Astrid Mcelroy
Defendant:
The Bibb County Health Care Authority doing business as Bibb Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
