District Court Cases in Arkansas
Cases 1 - 10 of 65,733
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Troka v. McCown et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ethan Troka
Defendant:
Patrick McCown, North Central Unit Chaple, Jeffery Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Arkansas Department of Corrections
as 4:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Ethan C Hill
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. WalMart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05109
Plaintiff:
Insight Direct USA, Inc.
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Griffin v. Trucking Martins, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv06066
Plaintiff:
James Griffin
Defendant:
Trucking Martins, LLC, Tennessee Contract Carriers, Inc. and James Rozzelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cadwallader v. Karas et al
as 5:2024cv05107
Plaintiff:
David Cadwallader
Defendant:
John Karas, Nurse Kelly Hinely, Justyn McEntire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winston v. McGee et al
as 6:2024cv06067
Plaintiff:
Travorious Jamar Winston
Defendant:
Nurse McGee, Nurse Champon and Sgt. Oscar Rondoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Sieger et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Brown
Defendant:
Gene Sieger and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Authement v. Card et al
as 6:2024cv06068
Plaintiff:
Jerry Peter Authement
Defendant:
Cpl Mark Card, Samae Tucker, Sgt Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
