District Court Cases in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 87,444
Manglik v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Amit Manglik
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Yarborough v. HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 5:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Ernest Yarborough
Defendant:
HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC. and VISA, Inc.
Williams v. Barrier Island Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Williams
Defendant:
Barrier Island Inc. and Lonnie Perry Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Williams v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03124
Plaintiff:
Jasper Williams
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawkins v. Thompson et al
as 5:2024ct03123
Plaintiff:
Darnell Lamar Dawkins
Defendant:
Captain Tanesha Thompson, Captain Powell Wendell, Sergeant Dunia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bhalla et al v. Nye et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Varun K Bhalla and Allison C Bhalla
Defendant:
John E Nye, IV, Joshua Eran Nye, Cynthia Thibault Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hubbard v. Southwood Realty Company
as 3:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Justin Hubbard
Defendant:
Southwood Realty Company
WOODBURY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WOODBURY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Moorhead v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Mark W Moorhead
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
