First Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,395
August Image LLC v. The Nest Real Estate Agency LLC
as 1:2024cv11302
Plaintiff:
August Image LLC
Defendant:
The Nest Real Estate Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
iD Auto, LLC, et al v. IDParts LLC
as 24-1462
Plaintiff:
ID AUTO, LLC and ID AUTO, INC.
Defendant:
IDPARTS LLC
Interested Party:
DLA PIPER LLP and MICHAEL A. GELLER
Varga v. White et al
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gerard Varga
Defendant:
Mike White, Illumination Animation and Chris Meledandri
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DS Advanced Enterprises v. LEDVANCE LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11155
Plaintiff:
DS Advanced Enterprises
Defendant:
LEDVANCE LLC and Lowes Global Sourcing Shanghai Trading Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Impulse Communications, Inc. v. Uplift Games, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Impulse Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Uplift Games, LLC, Treetop Games LLC and Lionfield Investments Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11099
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC et al v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11083
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11085
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11092
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11095
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
