Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 1 - 10
United States of America v. 504,385.19 in United States Currency
as 2:2020cv01996
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Replevin & Conversion
Carrier Corporation v. Character One LLC
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Carrier Corporation
Defendant:
Character One LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thompson v. E-7 Logistics, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Zavion C. Thompson
Defendant:
E-7 Logistics, LLC, Vladimir Ilic, Cody Scott Graska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Stewart v. The Kroger Company et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bradley Stewart
Defendant:
The Kroger Company and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Reed v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Tommie James Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA v. THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
DIABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and KODY KINSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
WINSLOW v. LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
WILLIS R. WINSLOW
Defendant:
LONNIE BUSH REAL ESTATE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
